Home Feedback Search

                Litigation                                                  
 

 

Home

 

Daniel R. Wotman & Associates, LLC are civil and commercial trial attorneys who provide quality legal representation through the use of trial advocacy to promote justice and fairness for injured persons and businesses. We have achieved equitable and fair jury verdicts, judicial decisions and settlements for our clients within the bounds of the law. We seek to safeguard victims' rights, particularly the right to trial by jury.

 

Our firm has provided strong representation for thousands of individuals and small businesses who have been defrauded in connection with business and real estate transactions where fraud and RICO claims are vigorously prosecuted to recover millions of dollars of monies stolen from these clients. The firm has handled fraud cases in the cell phone industry on behalf of sub dealers, in cooperative apartment buildings on behalf of residential shareholders and in the residential mortgage market on behalf of defrauded borrowers.

 

Our firm has also successfully conducted cases in the areas of torts, professional legal and medical malpractice, employment discrimination, civil rights and certain family law cases involving children.

 

The also firm conducts all aspects of commercial litigation cases in federal and state courts in New York, administrative tribunals and arbitration panels from pre-trial motions and discovery through hearings, bench and jury trials, to oral argument before appellate courts. The firm has an excellent track record on complex commercial cases, including: Corporate and Partnership disputes, Lender Liability actions, Collections, Federal Securities violations, Fraud Prosecutions, Breach of Contract actions, International Disputes, Federal Civil RICO, and Business Torts. Daniel Wotman, the managing partner of the firm, successfully defended Mobil Oil Corporation in a major products liability action. Mr. Wotman was also an integral member of the litigation team that won the Sam Heyman/GAF Proxy contest wherein the first insurgent shareholder unseated an existing board of directors of a major U.S. corporation. Mr. Wotman was also a principal member of the corporate/litigation team that defeated Victor Posner in his attempt to stop the merger of Peabody with The Pullman Company, a subsidiary of Allied-Signal. Mr. Wotman also defended lawsuits on behalf of Razor Ruddock, the number one ranked heavy weight boxing contender in the world, in lawsuits by trainers and promoters.

Representative Cases

  • Peabody International Corporation v. Victor Posner, et. al., U.S. District Court, D. Conn.; Wall St. J., Sept. 25, 1985, at 1, col. 2 (action on behalf of target company against insurgent stockholder for federal securities law violations and attempted bribery resulting in five year standstill agreement and sale of stock interest).

  • Samuel J. Heyman v. GAF Corporation, et. al., U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y.; N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1983, at 2, col. 5, Section D (action on behalf of dissident stockholder against Chief Executive Officer and Board of Directors for violations of federal proxy solicitation rules and mismanagement for purposes of perpetuating control resulting in election of dissident slate of directors).

  • New York Telephone Company v. Mobil Oil Corp., et. al., 99 A.D.2d 185, 473 N.Y.S.2d 172 (1st Dept. 1984); N.Y.L.J., Mar. 12, 1984, at 1, col. 6 (prosecution of appeal in products liability action on behalf of Mobil Oil resulting in reversal of Appellate Term's order denying motion to dismiss cause of action against Mobil).

  • Benjamin Frank Cain, et. al. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 549 F. Supp. 963 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) (15 week trial on behalf of 52 pilots and engineers against TWA and Saudi Arabian Airlines for breach of lifelong employment contracts resulting in favorable verdicts and settlement).

  • United States of America v. Martin B. Abrams, et. al., 543 F. Supp. 1184 (S.D.N.Y. 1982); N.Y. Times, Sept. 2, 1982, at 16, col. 1, Section D (ten week trial on behalf of co-defendant Robert Pierce, executive of Mego International Toy Company, resulting in acquittal on charges of tax evasion and mail fraud).

  • United States of America v. Arthur Sullivan, 694 F.2d 1348 (2d Cir. 1982) (conduct and argument of appeal as youngest member of Second Circuit's Criminal Justice Act Panel on behalf of defendant from conviction for armed robbery).

  • Gerald Colby Zilg v. Prentice Hall, Inc. and E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 717 F.2d 671 (2d Cir. 1983); N.Y. Times, April 17, 1984, at 17, col. 1, Section A (defense of appeal from district court judgment against DuPont for tortiously interfering with contract between Prentice-Hall and Zilg, author of book entitled "DuPont: Behind the Nylon Curtain" for listing with the Book-of-the-Month Club).

  • Mound v. Bartos, Sup. Ct., N.Y. Co., April 1982 (preparation and conduct of trial for attorneys fees in trust and estates action resulting in favorable decision).

  • R.A. Gilbert, Trustee v. S 'n S Inc. (In re The Washington Group, Inc.), U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Cir. 1984 (prosecution of appeal in breach of sales contract action resulting in affirmance of bankruptcy court's disallowance of supplier's claim).

  • Leone International Films, Inc v. Allied Artists Pictures Corporation, et al., Sup. Ct., N.Y. Co. 1987 (action of behalf of movie producer against motion picture company, distributors and limited partnership syndication for breach of financing agreement, improper sale of copyrights and distribution rights in several motion pictures).

  • Savoy Reinsurance Company, Ltd. v. CNAC, U.S. District Courts, New Mexico, Texas and Florida 1987 (actions by reinsurance company against primary insurance company for breach of reinsurance agreements).

  • Royal Pita, Inc. v. Mediterranean Pita, U.S. District Court, E.D.N.Y. 1988 (defense of action against bread manufacturer by competing bread manufacturer for trademark infringement).

  • Sussal v. Executive Button, Sup. Ct., Nassau Co. 1988 (defense of action by one shareholder against another for violations of buy out agreement).

  • Sandhurst Securities v. Prudential Bache Securities (In re Sandhurst Securities), U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. 1988 (prosecution of claim against Prudential Bache Securities, Inc. on behalf of Securities Brokerage Firm for breach of clearing agreement, violations of securities laws and RICO).

  • Prosecution and Trial of Several Will Contests on Behalf of Contestants in Surrogate's Court Resulting in Successful Settlements.

  • Copenhagen Handelsbank v. Drexel, U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. 1989 (assist in prosecution of action by foreign bank against investment banking house for participation with retailer in submitting false financial statements of retailer to induce bank to lend funds to buy out principals of investment banking house of interests in retailer).

  • Representation of Chartwell Realty Partners, Real Estate Syndicator, in Defense of Fraud Claims by Limited Partners in U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y.

  • Morin v. Trupin, et al., U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. 1988 (defense of president of general partner of real estate limited partnerships against federal securities fraud charges).

  • Orimex Trading Corp. v. Berman, Sup. Ct., N.Y. Co.; App. Div. 1st Dep't. 1990 (prosecution of claim for margin calls on behalf of West German brokerage house resulting in favorable settlement).

  • Halley Optical Corp. v. Jagar International, U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. 1989 (prosecution of claim for return of illegal foreign kick back payments on behalf of principal against agent resulting in sizable settlement).

  • Sobel v. Mizlou Communications U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. 1989 (prosecution of action on behalf of investment banking advisor against public company for failure to honor investment banking agreement resulting in favorable settlement).

  • Garner v. May Courier America, Ltd., et al., U. S. District Court, E.D.N.Y. 1990 (defense of air courier company, its principals and attorneys in RICO action resulting in dismissal of virtually all causes of action in forty (40) page court decision after four amended complaints).

  • Sports News Network v. Mizlou Communications, U. S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. 1990 (prosecution of trademark infringement action for unlawful use of trade name).

  • Castelazo v. Vallen, U. S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. 1990 (defense of principal officers of brokerage house in securities fraud action by investors).

  • Glazier v. Crossland Savings Bank, Sup. Ct., Kings Co. 1991 (prosecution of action on behalf of borrower for lender liability claim against bank).

  • North Unity Corp., et al. v. Carlyle Northport Marina Associates, Carlyle Construction Corp., Citibank, N.A., et al. (In re Northport Marina Associates), U.S. Bankruptcy Court, E.D.N.Y. 1991 (representation of general partner against other general partner, construction company and lender for fraudulent and unauthorized chapter 11 filing seeking to unlawfully remove general partner's interest and participation in development and operation of marina complex).

  • Carlyle Northport Marina Associates v. North Unity Corp., American Arbitration Association, 1992 (New York Office)(defense of one general partner against claim by other general partner for breach of partnership agreement).

  • Citibank, N.A. v. Joseph Weinstein, Allen Weinstein, Paul Lawrence, Robert Lawrence, North Unity Corp., et al., Sup. Ct., Suffolk Co. 1991 (defense of individual guarantors against mortgage foreclosure proceedings).

  • Maxway v. New Era Knitting Mills, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, W.D. N. Carolina 1992 (defense of supplier in preference action by debtor/manufacturer).

  • Burg v. Brunswick Hospital (In re Brunswick Hospital), U.S. Bankruptcy Court, E.D.N.Y. 1992 (prosecution of proceedings by substantial personal injury claimant against bankrupt hospital resulting in agreement to allow claimant to recover against hospital's medical malpractice trust fund and to lift automatic stay to allow trial of medical malpractice action in U.S. District Court to proceed forward).

  • Janks Morton v. Donovan "Razor" Ruddock, et al., U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. 1992 (defense of heavy weight boxer ranked number 2 in the world in action by former trainer for breach of contract in connection with bouts against Mike Tyson).

  • Don King Productions v. Donovan "Razor" Ruddock, et al., U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. 1992 (defense of heavy weight boxer ranked number 2 in the world in action by promoter for breach of contract).

  • Slater v. Carnevale, U.S. District Court, E.D.N.Y. 1995 (prosecution of RICO action against executrix and beneficiaries of estate).

  • Cassidy v. Tucker, Supreme Court, NY 1995 (prosecution of fraud action in connection with transfer of property and mortgage).

  • Antitrust review and compliance in connection with 1997 acquisition by Ratheon of microwave computer chip manufacturing division of Texas Instruments.

  • Sithe Energies Corp. v. Mohawk Power Authority, Supreme Court, NY County 1997 (prosecution of breach of independent power producer's contract with NYS Public Electric Utility Company).

     

 

Home ]

Send mail to wotmand@drwlaw.net with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: 09/09/04